Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Metode Belajar Meningkatkan Nilai Mata Kuliah Kalkulus 2 Masa Pandemi Covid-19

  • Cici Cahyana Amatullah Universitas Mitra Karya
Keywords: Creative Thinking Ability, Online Learning Methods, Calculus Course Value 2

Abstract

During this pandemic, all nations of the world are required to take part in overcoming life's problems, including in the field of education. One of the ways taken in the field of education is to carry out online learning activities. The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of students' creative thinking abilities and methods. online learning on the value of calculus courses 2. The variables of this study were the ability to think creatively, online learning methods and grades of calculus subjects. Data were collected using observation techniques, questionnaires, tests, analyzed quantitatively. The results showed 72. 7% of the variable Value of the Calculus Course (Y) is determined by the variable factor of creative thinking ability (X1) and learning method (X2) while the remaining 27. 3% is determined by other factors, 54. 4% of the variable value of calculus2 (Y) is determined by the variable factor of creative thinking ability. (X1), 59. 5% of the variable value of the 2 calculus course (Y) is determined by the variable factor el online learning method (X2). This study only reveals internal factors, namely the ability to think creatively and online learning methods, even though there are many other factors that can affect the value of calculus courses 2. Weaknesses found in this study need to be followed up with research the next which is related and relevant to the problems contained in this study

References

Al-Agili, Mohamed Z. G. , Mustafa Bin Mamat, Lazim Abdullah, and Hamdan Abdul Maad. 2012. “The Factors Influence Students’ Achievement in Mathematics: A Case for Libyan's Students. ” World Applied Sciences Journal 17 (9): 1224–30.

Al-Kadiri, Nizar. “Kemampuan Awal siswa”. Edukasi Kompasiana, 2009.

Aizikovitsh 2014. The Extent of Mathematical Creativity and Aesthetics in SolvingProblems among Students Attending the Mathematically Talented YouthProgram. Creative Education,5, 228-241. Diakses Darihttp://file. scirp. org/pdf/CE_2014031217160229. pdfAl-Khalili, A. A. 2005. Mengembangkan Kreativitas Anak. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar

http://edukasi. kompasiana. com/2009/12/22/kemampuan-awal-siswa/ (diakses 13Agustus 2010).

Aly, Abdullah dan Eny Rahma. 1998. Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

Anorga, Pandji. Psikologi Kerja. 1991. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Anggoro, M. T. , Hardhono, A. P. , Belawati, T. , & Darmayanti, T. (2001). Tutorial elektronik melalui internet dan fax-internet (Electronic tutorial through internet and fax-internet). Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, 2 (1), 60-77.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta. 2004. Management Penelitian. Jakarta: Misan Publika.

Aritonang, Keke T. 2005. ”Kompensasi Kerja. ” BPK Penabur, http://www. bpkpenabur. or. id/files/Hal. 0116%20Kompensasi%20Kerja. pdf (diakses 1 Nopember 2011).

Anderson, John R. 1990. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implication. 3rd Edition New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Baek, Youngkyun, Yan Xu, Sanghoon Han, and Jungwon Cho. 2015. gExploring Effects of Intrinsic Motivation and Prior Knowledge on Student Achievements in Game-Based Learning. Smart Computing Review 5 (5): 368. 77. doi:10. 6029.

Belawati, T. (2003). Penerapan e-learning dalam pendidikan jarak jauh di Indonesia (The application of e-learning in distance education in Indonesia).

Buchori, Mochtar. Pendidikan Antisipatoris. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2001

Bachri Thalib, Syamsul. 2010. Psikologi Pendidikan Berbasis Analisis Empiris Aplikatif. Jakarta: Pranada Media Group.

Barlow, Daniel Lenox. 1985. Educational Psychology: The Teaching- Learning Process. Chicago: The Moody Bible Institute.

Best, John B. 1985. Cognitive Psychology. 2nd Edition. New York: Wet Publishing Company.

Classroom Assessment”. Phi Delta Kappa International Journal, 1998.

Crow L. And A. Crow. 1980. Education Psychology. New York: American Book Company.

http://blog. discoveryeducation. com/assessment/files/2009/02/blackbox_article. pdf (akses: 19 Januari 2011)

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2006.

Djaali dan Puji Muljono. Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2008.

Hw, Slamet. 2003. Kalkulus II. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. 2007. Kalkulus I. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.

Kuntarto, E. 2017. Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Perkuliahan Bahasa Indonesia Di Perguruan Tinggi. Journal Indonesian Language Education and Literature, Vol. 3, No. 1, Hal. 99 - 110.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 16 Tahun 2007. Tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Diknas. Jakarta.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005. tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Diknas. Jakarta.

Rasyad, Aminudin. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press &Yayasan PEP-Ex 8, 2003.

Spencer Lyle M and Signe M. Spencer. 1993. Competence at Work, ModelsFor Superior Performance. Canada: John Willey & Sons, Inc.

Sudjana, Nana. 1989. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: SinarBaru Algensindo Offset. 2001. Metode Statistik. Bandung:Tarsito.

Soedijarto. 1993. Menjadi Pendidik Nasional yang Relevan dan Bermutu. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. 1998. Pendidikan Sebagai Sarana Reformasi Mental dalam Upaya Pembangunan Bangsa. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Suyanto, dkk. 2000. Refleksi dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Adicita.

Suhendri, H. (2010). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Matematis–Logis dan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif 1(1): 29-39 ISSN: 2088-351X.

Syah, Muhibbin. 2000. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru Edisi Revisi, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tilaar, H. A. R. 2002. Membenahi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003. tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Diknas. Jakarta. 89

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005. tentang Guru dan Dosen. Diknas. Jakarta.

Zainul, Asmawi dan Noehi Nasution. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI Universitas Terbuka, 2005.

Published
2021-04-05
How to Cite
Amatullah, C. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dan Metode Belajar Meningkatkan Nilai Mata Kuliah Kalkulus 2 Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JURNAL ILMIAH WAHANA PENDIDIKAN, 7(2), 216-229. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4662687